1. Board materially alters Accounting 7 at March 2025 meeting, seizing control of member-protected restricted reserve funds, violating bylaws, and eroding financial safeguards.

2. Board engages in financial misrepresentation by inflating project costs, misclassifying discretionary spending as necessary repairs, and prematurely committing funds for the $60K Bocce Court, $31K Basketball Court, and $3M Pool Replacement, undermining transparency, fiscal integrity, and member trust.

3. Board abuses authority by disciplining a member for asking questions, holding an improper “special” meeting to bypass member will, unilaterally rewriting Accounting 7 to expand spending power, misrepresenting a $60K Bocce Court project in the Reserve Study, and allowing hostile, intimidating conduct at meetings in violation of the bylaws and declaration.

4. Board fails to follow bylaws by allowing treasurer instead of general manager to present adopted rather than proposed budget at 2025 annual meeting, ignoring member vote, violating required procedures for notice and transparency, and knowingly acting contrary to governing documents.

5. Board disregards member vote by holding an improper non-emergency “special” meeting in March 2025, violating Robert’s Rules of Order, limiting member participation, and acting outside its procedural authority.

6. Board adds $31,000 basketball court project to 2024 reserve study without justification or member input, misusing a past “pristine condition” directive to bypass bylaws, obscure true spending plans, and prioritize cosmetic upgrades over critical infrastructure needs and fiscal transparency.

7. Board misrepresents $60,000 bocce court project as early-stage discussion before retroactively adding it to the 2024 reserve study, falsely labeling a discretionary replacement as a repair, invoking a nonbinding “pristine condition” directive to bypass member approval and undermine fiscal transparency.

8. Board suppresses open discussion and limits transparency by reprimanding a board member for asking legitimate questions, restricting access to amendment documents and financials through costly printed copies and nondisclosure agreements, and creating an intimidating atmosphere that discourages meaningful participation despite claims of openness and adherence to Robert’s Rules of Order.